Federal Requirement 4.2: Program Curriculum
The institution’s curriculum is directly related and appropriate to the purpose and goals of the institution and the diplomas, certificates, or degrees awarded.
The faculty and academic administration at the University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee (USF Sarasota-Manatee) ensure that the curriculum is directly related and appropriate to the mission and goals of the institution and the degree programs by three main processes: (1) Curriculum Approval, (2) Annual Assessment of Degree Programs, and (3) Program Reviews at least every seven years.
Through the Memorandum of Delegation, the USF System President delegated the authority to approve new academic programs to USF Sarasota-Manatee’s Regional Chancellor. The Regional Chancellor relies on the expertise of faculty, deans, and the Regional Vice Chancellor for Academic & Student Affairs to assure program quality and development. USF Sarasota-Manatee’s faculty, through the Faculty Senate’s Academic Programs Committee (APC) and the administration, through Academic Council, carefully evaluate curricular changes to determine their appropriateness to higher education and the USF Sarasota-Manatee Mission: “The University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee provides high quality bachelor’s and graduate-level education and scholarly activity in a personalized learning community that prepares successful leaders and responsible citizens.“
USF Sarasota-Manatee offers eighteen bachelor’s degree fields (17 active) supported and in demand by the local community; the Early Childhood Education program is currently inactive due to no enrollment and is not accepting applications until demand increases. The faculty have developed Curriculum Ladders to ensure proper sequencing of courses by undergraduate students. USF Sarasota-Manatee’s Academic Catalog lists the curriculum for each of the following undergraduate degree programs:
*Program has four concentrations across three colleges.
USF Sarasota-Manatee also offers nine (9) master’s degree programs (7 active) supported by and in demand by the local community and in keeping with the mission, each with its own curriculum. The MA in Elementary Education and the MA in Reading Education are inactive due to no enrollments and are not accepting applications until demand increases. Each master’s degree program’s curriculum is listed in the graduate catalog:
|Catalog Reference||Course Description Example|
|Business Administration, MBA||Graduate Catalog: Business Administration, MBA||Course Description: Business Administration, MBA|
|Criminal Justice Administration, MA||Graduate Catalog: Criminal Justice Administration, MA||Course Description: Criminal Justice Administration, MA|
|Education, General, MA||Graduate Catalog: Education General, MA||Course Description: Education General, MA|
|Educational Leadership, M Ed||Graduate Catalog: Educational Leadership, M Ed||Course Description: Educational Leadership, M Ed|
|English Education, MA||Graduate Catalog: English Education, MA||Course Description: English Education, MA|
|Hospitality Management, MS||Graduate Catalog: Hospitality Management, MS||Course Description: Hospitality Management, MA|
|Teaching, MAT||Graduate Catalog: Teaching, MAT||Course Description: Teaching, MAT|
Curriculum Approval Process
USF Sarasota-Manatee and USF System faculty and administration developed procedures for approval of new academic proposals (Instructions for Submitting Proposals, and Guidelines for APC Members), as outlined in flowcharts for each process: New Course, Degree Program, Certificate, Concentration, and Course Change. Throughout the process, faculty and administration consider the appropriateness of the proposals to USF Sarasota-Manatee’s mission and the quality of the academic content regardless of the delivery system, whether it be face-to-face, online, or blended. These procedures follow commonly accepted standards and practices in higher education and apply to both undergraduate and graduate programs.
Below are the main steps in the process of curricular approval:
- College Initiation – Faculty and Deans
- Academic Programs Committee (APC) Review – Committee of the Faculty Senate
- USF Sarasota-Manatee Academic Council Review – Senior Academic Affairs Leadership
- USF Board of Trustees (BOT) Approval (new degree proposals only)
- Florida Board of Governors (BOG) Notification
Please see Comprehensive Standard 3.4.1 (Academic Program Approval) for more details of the curricular approval processes at USF Sarasota-Manatee.
Annual Assessment of Degree Programs
Using the USF Sarasota-Manatee Assessment System, faculty annually assess student learning outcomes in each of the undergraduate and graduate degree programs to ensure program coherence and quality. Faculty from all four colleges use a similar design template, the Assessment Planning Record Template, when preparing the annual plan and subsequent review of results report each year. While each program is different, all assessment plans share the following common elements:
- Section I – Program mission statement
- Section II – Program/student learning outcomes
- Section III – Means/methods of assessment
- Section IV – Recap of previous cycle analysis results and use of results by learning outcome
- Section V – Current cycle assessment results by learning outcome
- Section VI – Current cycle analysis of results, planned changes, faculty comments, and recorded curricular and assessment process changes
- Section VII – Summary of program improvement initiatives to be pursued in the coming year
- Section VIII – Dean’s response to faculty’s analysis
At the start of each assessment cycle (the beginning of the academic year), faculty establish the plan for each learning outcome: the methods of assessment and the measures or levels of expectation. At the close of each assessment cycle, faculty record the following by degree program: assessment results and use of results in program improvement.
|Fall/Spring||Submission of Data by Faculty: Faculty submit to IR, or students input into TaskStream for the College of Education (COE), student learning outcome data gathered as described in the Means/Methods of Assessment portion of their annual assessment plan.|
|Summer||Samples Selected/Scores Calculated: For all but COE, IR prepares clean samples of student work and renders them anonymous with the removal of any personal identifiers. Sample size is representative of the quantity of work submitted. IR selects samples randomly. IR forwards scoring rubrics and the samples to faculty raters for scoring. IR tracks data, such as embedded test scores, on spreadsheets and adds them to the assessment report for comparison to previous year results.|
|Late Summer||Preparation for Faculty Review: IR records rubric scores onto spreadsheets along with calculated statistics (e.g. means, standard deviations) for review by faculty. In COE the assessment coordinator runs reports from TaskStream and inputs results into the assessment reports in preparation for faculty review.|
|Early Fall||Assessment Review: Faculty meet to review the results of the assessment cycle reports. Faculty comment and record initiatives. The college’s dean reviews and comments on each degree program’s results/plans.|
For additional details, please see Comprehensive Standard 126.96.36.199 Institutional Effectiveness (Educational Programs).
Program Review Process and Timeline
The Florida Board of Governor’s (BOG) requires the periodic review of all academic degree programs in state universities at least once every seven years from the date of the preceding review or from the implementation date of new academic programs or to align with a specialized accreditation cycle (BOG Regulation 8.015). Program reviews must document how individual academic programs are achieving stated student learning and program objectives within the context of the university’s mission, as illustrated in the academic learning compacts for baccalaureate programs. The results of the program reviews are expected to inform strategic planning, program development, and budgeting decisions at the university level and, when appropriate, at the state level.
USF System Policy 10-062 on Academic Program Review and Specialized Accreditation requires each USF System institution to designate an office “to be responsible for the review of all academic degree programs” and “to establish guidelines for the program review process.” USF Sarasota-Manatee has adopted its own Program Review Guidelines and recommended forms for the Program Review Self-study, the Program Review External Reviewer, and the Dean’s Program Review. The office responsible for program review at USF Sarasota-Manatee is Academic Affairs.
Regarding specialized accreditation, the College of Business’ degree programs are reviewed by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) on a five-year cycle with the last review in 2013-14. The National Council to Accredit Teacher Education (NCATE) reviews the College of Education programs on a ten-year cycle with the last review in 2014-15.
USF Sarasota-Manatee’s Program Review Timetable for 2014-15 to 2020-21 indicates scheduled program review and specialized accreditation review.
Please see Comprehensive Standard 188.8.131.52 (Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs) for further information on Program Review at USF Sarasota-Manatee.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND EVIDENCE